Chemical Energetics: Question 5

Syllabus 23.3, 23.4

Structured A2 8 marks

Magnesium carbonate decomposes on heating:

MgCO3(s)MgO(s)+CO2(g)\text{MgCO}_3\text{(s)} \rightarrow \text{MgO(s)} + \text{CO}_2\text{(g)}

For this reaction, ΔH=+117 kJ mol1\Delta H^{\ominus} = +117\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}. The table gives the standard entropy of each substance.

Substance SS^{\ominus} / J K1mol1\text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}
MgCO3(s)\text{MgCO}_3\text{(s)} 65.165.1
MgO(s)\text{MgO(s)} 26.926.9
CO2(g)\text{CO}_2\text{(g)} 213.6213.6

(a) Calculate the standard entropy change, ΔS\Delta S^{\ominus}, for this reaction. [2]

(b) State, with a reason, why ΔS\Delta S^{\ominus} for this reaction is positive. [1]

(c) Calculate the minimum temperature, in K, at which this decomposition becomes thermodynamically feasible. [3]

(d) Determine, showing your working, whether this reaction is feasible at 293 K293\ \text{K}. [2]

Show worked solution Hide worked solution

Worked solution

Part (a): Standard entropy change

Using ΔS=S(products)S(reactants)\Delta S^{\ominus} = \sum S^{\ominus}(\text{products}) - \sum S^{\ominus}(\text{reactants}):

ΔS=[S(MgO)+S(CO2)]S(MgCO3)\Delta S^{\ominus} = \left[S^{\ominus}(\text{MgO}) + S^{\ominus}(\text{CO}_2)\right] - S^{\ominus}(\text{MgCO}_3)

ΔS=(26.9+213.6)65.1=240.565.1=175.4 J K1mol1\Delta S^{\ominus} = (26.9 + 213.6) - 65.1 = 240.5 - 65.1 = 175.4\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}

Check (independent recomputation): 26.9+213.6=240.526.9+213.6=240.5; 240.565.1=175.4240.5-65.1=175.4, consistent.

Part (b): Why ΔS\Delta S^{\ominus} is positive

The reaction converts one mole of solid into one mole of solid plus one mole of gas. Gas particles move freely and can occupy far more positions and energy states than particles fixed in a solid lattice, so the number of ways of arranging the particles and their energy (the number of accessible microstates) increases sharply. This increase in disorder means the total entropy of the system rises, giving a positive ΔS\Delta S^{\ominus}.

Part (c): Minimum temperature for feasibility

A reaction becomes just feasible when ΔG=0\Delta G^{\ominus} = 0, i.e. when: ΔH=TΔS\Delta H^{\ominus} = T\Delta S^{\ominus}

Rearranging for TT: T=ΔHΔST = \frac{\Delta H^{\ominus}}{\Delta S^{\ominus}}

ΔH\Delta H^{\ominus} is given in kJ mol1\text{kJ mol}^{-1}, so ΔS\Delta S^{\ominus} must be converted to the same energy unit: ΔS=175.4 J K1mol1=0.1754 kJ K1mol1\Delta S^{\ominus} = 175.4\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1} = 0.1754\ \text{kJ K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}

Substituting: T=1170.1754=667 K (3 s.f.)T = \frac{117}{0.1754} = 667\ \text{K} \ (3\ \text{s.f.})

Check (independent recomputation): 0.1754×667=0.1754×600+0.1754×67=105.24+11.75=116.991170.1754 \times 667 = 0.1754\times600 + 0.1754\times67 = 105.24+11.75=116.99 \approx 117, consistent, confirming T667 KT \approx 667\ \text{K}.

Above this temperature, TΔST\Delta S^{\ominus} exceeds ΔH\Delta H^{\ominus}, making ΔG\Delta G^{\ominus} negative and the decomposition feasible.

Part (d): Feasibility at 293 K

Using ΔG=ΔHTΔS\Delta G^{\ominus} = \Delta H^{\ominus} - T\Delta S^{\ominus} at T=293 KT = 293\ \text{K}:

TΔS=293×0.1754=51.4 kJ mol1T\Delta S^{\ominus} = 293 \times 0.1754 = 51.4\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}

ΔG=11751.4=+65.6 kJ mol1\Delta G^{\ominus} = 117 - 51.4 = +65.6\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}

Check (independent recomputation): 293×0.1754=293×0.17+293×0.0054=49.81+1.58=51.39293\times0.1754 = 293\times0.17+293\times0.0054 = 49.81+1.58=51.39; 11751.39=65.6165.6117-51.39=65.61\approx65.6, consistent.

Since ΔG\Delta G^{\ominus} is positive at 293 K293\ \text{K} (well below the 667 K667\ \text{K} minimum found in (c)), the reaction is not thermodynamically feasible at this temperature.

Final answers

  • (a) ΔS=+175.4 J K1mol1\Delta S^{\ominus} = \boxed{+175.4\ \text{J K}^{-1}\text{mol}^{-1}}
  • (b) Positive because a solid reactant produces a gaseous product, which is far more disordered than a solid.
  • (c) Minimum feasibility temperature =667 K= \boxed{667\ \text{K}} (3 s.f.)
  • (d) ΔG(293 K)=+65.6 kJ mol1\Delta G^{\ominus}(293\ \text{K}) = \boxed{+65.6\ \text{kJ mol}^{-1}}, not feasible at 293 K.