Worked solution
Part (a): Deducing the order with respect to A and B
Order with respect to A (compare Experiments 1 and 2, where [B] is unchanged at 0.10 mol dm−3):
[A]1[A]2=0.100.20=2rate1rate2=2.0×10−34.0×10−3=2
Doubling [A] doubles the rate, so rate ∝[A]1: the reaction is first order with respect to A.
Order with respect to B (compare Experiments 2 and 3, where [A] is unchanged at 0.20 mol dm−3):
[B]2[B]3=0.100.20=2rate2rate3=4.0×10−316.0×10−3=4
Doubling [B] quadruples the rate (4=22), so rate ∝[B]2: the reaction is second order with respect to B.
Part (b): Rate equation and overall order
rate=k[A][B]2
Overall order =1+2=3 (third order overall).
Part (c): Calculating the rate constant, k
Rearranging for k and substituting Experiment 1’s data ([A]=0.10, [B]=0.10, rate =2.0×10−3):
k=[A][B]2rate=0.10×(0.10)22.0×10−3=0.10×0.0102.0×10−3=1.0×10−32.0×10−3=2.0
Check using Experiment 3’s data instead ([A]=0.20, [B]=0.20, rate =16.0×10−3):
k=0.20×(0.20)216.0×10−3=0.20×0.04016.0×10−3=8.0×10−316.0×10−3=2.0
Both experiments give the same value, confirming k=2.0.
Units: for a third-order reaction, k=[A][B]2rate has units
(mol dm−3)×(mol dm−3)2mol dm−3s−1=mol3dm−9mol dm−3s−1=mol1−3dm−3−(−9)s−1=mol−2dm6s−1
So k=2.0 mol−2dm6s−1.
Part (d): Predicting the rate for new concentrations
Using the rate equation from part (b) with [A]=0.30 mol dm−3 and [B]=0.15 mol dm−3:
rate=k[A][B]2=2.0×0.30×(0.15)2=2.0×0.30×0.0225
Working left to right: 0.30×0.0225=0.00675, then 2.0×0.00675=0.0135.
Check by grouping differently: 2.0×0.30=0.60, then 0.60×0.0225=0.0135, the same result, confirming the calculation.
rate=1.35×10−2 mol dm−3s−1
Final answers
- (a) First order with respect to A; second order with respect to B.
- (b) rate=k[A][B]2; overall order =3.
- (c) k=2.0 mol−2dm6s−1.
- (d) rate=1.35×10−2 mol dm−3s−1.