Labour Markets and Wage Determination: Question 8
Syllabus 8.3
SunBright Solar installs rooftop solar panels and hires installer-hours in a perfectly competitive local labour market. The table below shows the quantity of installer-hours demanded per week and the quantity of installer-hours supplied per week at different wage rates, both before and after SunBright introduces a new mounting-rail tool that lets each installer complete more installations per hour.
| Wage rate ($ per hour) | before new tool (installer-hours/week) | after new tool (installer-hours/week) | (installer-hours/week) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 800 | 1100 | 500 |
| 12 | 760 | 1060 | 560 |
| 14 | 720 | 1020 | 620 |
| 16 | 680 | 980 | 680 |
| 18 | 640 | 940 | 740 |
| 20 | 600 | 900 | 800 |
| 22 | 560 | 860 | 860 |
(a) Using the table, state the equilibrium wage rate and quantity of installer-hours employed per week before the new tool is introduced. [2]
(b) The new mounting-rail tool raises each installer's marginal physical product, and therefore the marginal revenue product of labour, at every wage rate, shown in the "after new tool" column. Using the table, state the new equilibrium wage rate and quantity of installer-hours employed after the tool is introduced. [2]
(c) Explain why the change identified in (b) is a shift of the demand curve for labour, rather than a movement along it. [3]
(d) Calculate the percentage change in the equilibrium wage rate caused by the introduction of the new tool. [2]
Show worked solution Hide worked solution
Worked solution
Part (a): Equilibrium before the new tool
The equilibrium wage rate is the row of the table where the quantity of installer-hours demanded equals the quantity supplied, using the “before new tool” column. Scanning the table, this occurs at a wage rate of $16 per hour, where and .
So, before the new tool, the equilibrium wage rate is $16 per hour and equilibrium employment is 680 installer-hours per week.
Part (b): Equilibrium after the new tool
The new mounting-rail tool raises marginal physical product, so the marginal revenue product of labour, and therefore the quantity of installer-hours demanded, rises at every wage rate, as shown in the “after new tool” column. The new equilibrium is found where this new demand column equals the (unchanged) supply column. This occurs at a wage rate of $22 per hour, where and .
So, after the new tool, the equilibrium wage rate is $22 per hour and equilibrium employment is 860 installer-hours per week.
Part (c): Why this is a shift, not a movement along the curve
A movement along the demand curve for labour happens only when the wage rate itself changes, causing a different quantity to be read off the same curve. A shift of the demand curve happens when a non-wage determinant of labour demand changes instead, here, the new mounting-rail tool raises each installer’s marginal physical product (), and since , a higher raises the marginal revenue product of labour at every wage rate, not just at one. Because more installer-hours are now demanded at every possible wage (compare the “before” and “after” columns row by row), the whole demand curve for labour moves to the right. The new equilibrium in (b) is therefore where this shifted demand curve crosses the unchanged supply curve, not a different point on the original demand curve.
Part (d): Percentage change in the equilibrium wage rate
Using the original equilibrium wage of $16 as the base:
So the equilibrium wage rate rose by 37.5% as a result of the new tool.
Final answers
- (a) Equilibrium wage $16 per hour; equilibrium employment 680 installer-hours/week
- (b) New equilibrium wage $22 per hour; new equilibrium employment 860 installer-hours/week
- (c) This is a shift of the demand curve, caused by higher marginal physical product (a non-wage factor) raising MRP at every wage rate, not a movement along it
- (d) Percentage change in equilibrium wage rate +37.5%