Reversible Reactions and Equilibrium: Question 3
Syllabus 6.3
A chemical company is testing a new catalysed reaction between two gaseous elements, and , which combine to form the industrially useful compound :
The table shows the percentage yield of at equilibrium, measured in laboratory-scale trials at different temperatures and pressures.
| Pressure / atm | Temperature / °C | Percentage yield of XY₃ |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 300 | 82 |
| 50 | 500 | 55 |
| 200 | 300 | 91 |
| 200 | 500 | 68 |
(a) Use the data in the table to deduce whether the forward reaction is exothermic or endothermic. Explain your reasoning. [3]
(b) Use the data in the table to explain, in terms of the number of gas molecules on each side of the equation, why increasing the pressure increases the percentage yield of . [3]
(c) The reaction is very slow at 300 °C without a catalyst. State and explain the effect of adding a suitable catalyst on (i) the rate at which equilibrium is reached, and (ii) the percentage yield of shown in the table. [2]
(d) Suggest one economic reason, based on the data in the table, why the company would choose to operate at 300 °C rather than 500 °C, given that both temperatures use the same pressure of 200 atm. [2]
Show worked solution Hide worked solution
Worked solution
Part (a): Exothermic or endothermic?
Compare the yield at the two temperatures, keeping pressure fixed:
- At 50 atm: yield falls from 82% (300 °C) to 55% (500 °C).
- At 200 atm: yield falls from 91% (300 °C) to 68% (500 °C).
In both cases, raising the temperature lowers the percentage yield of . By Le Chatelier’s principle, increasing temperature always shifts the position of equilibrium in the endothermic direction. Since raising the temperature here shifts the equilibrium away from (towards and ), the reverse reaction must be the endothermic one.
That means the forward reaction (formation of ) is exothermic.
Part (b): Effect of pressure
Count the moles of gas molecules on each side of the equation:
There are fewer moles of gas molecules on the product side. Increasing the pressure shifts the position of equilibrium towards the side with fewer gas molecules, since that reduces the total number of particles and partially relieves the increased pressure. This favours the product, , so the percentage yield increases. Matching the data, where yield rises from 82% to 91% at 300 °C, and from 55% to 68% at 500 °C, as pressure increases from 50 to 200 atm.
Part (c): Effect of a catalyst
(i) Rate: A catalyst provides an alternative reaction pathway with a lower activation energy, so a much greater proportion of collisions between particles are successful. This means equilibrium is reached faster.
(ii) Percentage yield: The percentage yield of shown in the table is unaffected. A catalyst speeds up the forward and reverse reactions by the same factor, so it does not change the position of equilibrium. Only how quickly that position is reached.
Part (d): Why 300 °C rather than 500 °C
Since both options in this comparison use the same pressure (200 atm), the cost of the high-pressure equipment is the same either way. The relevant difference is yield:
Operating at 300 °C converts a much greater fraction of the and fed into the reactor into useful . This means less unreacted gas needs to be separated and recycled (or is wasted), so the process is more economical at 300 °C even though the reaction is slower there (which is why a catalyst, as in part (c), is used to compensate).
Final answers
- (a) Exothermic. Yield falls as temperature rises at both pressures.
- (b) Fewer gas moles on the product side (2 vs 4) higher pressure favours higher yield.
- (c) (i) Rate increases; (ii) percentage yield unchanged.
- (d) 300 °C gives a much higher yield (91% vs 68%) at the same pressure, so it is more economical.