Analysing Writers' Effects and Language Choices: Question 1

Syllabus R3, R4

Structured 4 marks

Read the passage, then answer the questions that follow.

The storm arrived without warning. Charcoal clouds rolled over the bay like a lid closing on a pot, and within minutes the sea had turned from silver to slate. Waves clawed at the harbour wall, dragging shingle back into the deep with a hiss, then hurling it forward again in a fresh assault. Out on the water, the old fishing boat pitched and bucked, a toy in the fists of the tide. Ren gripped the wheel until his knuckles whitened, watching the horizon vanish behind curtain after curtain of rain.

The wind screamed through the rigging, tugging at ropes as though impatient fingers were searching for a way in. Somewhere below deck, a loose hatch banged out its own frantic rhythm, over and over, refusing to be silenced. Ren's throat was raw with salt, his hands raw with rope, and still the shore would not come any closer.

Then, as suddenly as it had begun, the storm exhaled. The wind dropped to a low murmur, and a single band of pale gold broke through the cloud, resting on the water like a hand laid gently on a bruise.

(a) Identify one simile from the passage and explain the effect it has on the reader. [2]

(b) Identify one example of personification from the passage (not the phrase you used in part (a)) and explain the effect it has on the reader. [2]

Show worked solution Hide worked solution

Worked solution

Assessment focus

This question tests the core quote–technique–effect method: selecting the exact words that create an image, naming the technique accurately, and explaining precisely what effect it has on the reader, not just labelling it.

Part (a): Simile

A simile must contain an explicit comparison word (“like” or “as”). Two clear options in this passage:

  • “Charcoal clouds rolled over the bay like a lid closing on a pot”, compares the storm clouds to a lid sealing a pot. This suggests the sky is closing itself over the bay completely, trapping everything beneath it, and creates a sense of suffocation and inescapable danger before the storm has even fully broken.
  • “resting on the water like a hand laid gently on a bruise”. Compares the late sunlight to a gentle hand on an injury, suggesting a tender, careful kind of comfort after violence, and framing the sea itself as something wounded that is now being soothed.

Mark scheme. Up to 2 marks:

  • 1 mark for correctly identifying a genuine simile (must contain “like” or “as” and be quoted accurately).
  • 1 mark for an explanation that goes beyond naming the technique to state the specific effect the comparison creates (e.g. entrapment, tenderness after violence).

Part (b): Personification

Personification gives a non-human thing (waves, wind, the storm itself) a human or animal action or feeling. Strong options:

  • “Waves clawed at the harbour wall”. The waves are given the action of clawing, like an animal trying to tear something down, which makes the sea’s power feel deliberate and predatory rather than incidental.
  • “The wind screamed through the rigging”. The wind is given a human sound of pain or terror, intensifying the sense of violence and making the storm feel almost alive and aggressive.
  • “the storm exhaled”. The storm is given the human act of breathing out, suggesting the storm is a living creature finally relaxing, which makes its earlier fury feel like tension being released.

Mark scheme, up to 2 marks:

  • 1 mark for correctly identifying a genuine example of personification (a human/animal quality given to something non-human), distinct from the phrase used in (a).
  • 1 mark for an explanation of the specific effect (e.g. the storm feels like a deliberate attacker; the ending feels like a living creature calming down).

Common pitfalls specific to this text

  • “a toy in the fists of the tide” is a metaphor, not a simile. There is no “like/as”. Candidates who quote it in part (a) should not be credited for the simile mark, though the phrase itself does contain personification (“fists”) that could be credited in part (b).
  • Candidates sometimes explain the wind and waves as simply “showing the storm is strong” without engaging with the specific human quality given (clawing, screaming) and what that specifically suggests (aggression, deliberate menace) beyond generic intensity.