Electromagnetic Effects: Question 4

Syllabus 4.5.6

Structured Extended 7 marks

A power station generator produces electrical power at a primary voltage of Vp=400 VV_p = 400\text{ V}. This is fed into an ideal (100% efficient) step-up transformer with Np=200N_p = 200 turns on the primary coil and Ns=20000N_s = 20\,000 turns on the secondary coil, before being sent along transmission cables. The generator supplies a constant power output of P=40 kWP = 40\text{ kW}.

(a) Calculate the secondary (transmission) voltage, VsV_s. [2]

(b) Assuming the transformer is 100% efficient, calculate the current flowing in the transmission cables (the secondary current, IsI_s). [2]

(c) Suppose instead the electricity were transmitted directly at the primary voltage of 400 V400\text{ V}, with no step-up transformer, while still delivering the same power of 40 kW40\text{ kW}. Calculate the current that would flow in the cables in this case, and hence explain why transmitting power at high voltage instead greatly reduces the power wasted as heat in the cables. [3]

Show worked solution Hide worked solution

Worked solution

Part (a): Secondary voltage

For an ideal transformer, the voltages and numbers of turns are related by:

VpVs=NpNs\frac{V_p}{V_s} = \frac{N_p}{N_s}

Rearranging to make VsV_s the subject:

Vs=Vp×NsNpV_s = V_p \times \frac{N_s}{N_p}

Substituting the values Vp=400 VV_p = 400\text{ V}, Ns=20000N_s = 20\,000 and Np=200N_p = 200:

Vs=400×20000200=400×100V_s = 400 \times \frac{20\,000}{200} = 400 \times 100

Vs=40000 VV_s = \boxed{40\,000\text{ V}}

Part (b): Current in the transmission cables

For a 100% efficient transformer, no power is lost in the transformer itself, so the power delivered on the secondary side equals the power supplied on the primary side, P=40 kW=40000 WP = 40\text{ kW} = 40\,000\text{ W}.

Power, voltage and current are related by P=IVP = IV, so on the secondary side:

Is=PVs=40000 W40000 VI_s = \frac{P}{V_s} = \frac{40\,000\text{ W}}{40\,000\text{ V}}

Is=1 AI_s = \boxed{1\text{ A}}

Part (c): Transmitting at the primary voltage instead

If the same power were sent at the (lower) primary voltage of 400 V400\text{ V} with no step-up, the current needed would be:

Ip=PVp=40000 W400 VI_p = \frac{P}{V_p} = \frac{40\,000\text{ W}}{400\text{ V}}

Ip=100 AI_p = \boxed{100\text{ A}}

This current is 100100 times larger than the 1 A1\text{ A} found in part (b) for the high-voltage cables.

The power wasted as heat in a cable of resistance RR is given by Ploss=I2RP_{\text{loss}} = I^2R. Since power loss depends on the square of the current, a current that is 100100 times smaller (as in the high-voltage case) gives a power loss that is smaller by a factor of 1002=10000100^2 = 10\,000, not just 100100.

So stepping up to a high transmission voltage keeps the current in the cables very small for the same power delivered, and because power loss scales with I2I^2, this dramatically reduces the amount of electrical energy wasted as heat along the transmission cables, which is why the National Grid transmits electricity at very high voltages.

Final answers

  • (a) Secondary voltage Vs=V_s = 40000 V40\,000\text{ V} (40 kV)
  • (b) Secondary current Is=I_s = 1 A1\text{ A}
  • (c) Primary-voltage current Ip=I_p = 100 A100\text{ A}; since Ploss=I2RP_{\text{loss}} = I^2R, the 100×100\times smaller current at high voltage gives 10000×10\,000\times less power wasted as heat.