Market Failure and Externalities: Economics 9708 (Cambridge International AS & A Level)

Syllabus 7.3, 7.4 · Strand 2 The Price System and the Microeconomy

Questions
10
Total marks
82
Tier mix
10 Core

0 of 10 questions completed

Quick-fire this topic Practice set

Syllabus coverage

  • 7.3 6 questions
  • 7.4 8 questions

A market is allocatively efficient when price equals marginal cost, so resources are directed to their highest-valued use, and productively efficient when output is produced at the lowest possible cost. Market failure occurs whenever the free market fails to achieve one of these outcomes, and it is the theoretical justification for almost every government intervention studied elsewhere in this syllabus.

One major cause is the externality: a cost or benefit falling on a third party outside a transaction, so that the social cost or benefit diverges from the private one. Formally, marginal social cost is MSC=MPC+MECMSC = MPC + MEC and marginal social benefit is MSB=MPB+MEBMSB = MPB + MEB, where MECMEC and MEBMEB are the marginal external cost and benefit. A negative externality (e.g. pollution from production) means MSC>MPCMSC > MPC, so the free-market output is too high; a positive externality (e.g. education) means MSB>MPBMSB > MPB, so output is too low. In both cases the gap between the socially optimal and the market outcome is a deadweight welfare loss.

The exam-style problems below are original, with full worked solutions.

Question 1

Multiple choice A2 1 mark

A leather tannery discharges chemical waste into a river. A rice farm downstream relies on the river to irrigate its paddies, and the waste reduces the farm's rice yields. This cost imposed on the rice farm is not included in the market price of the leather the tannery sells.

Which equation correctly relates the tannery's marginal social cost (MSC), marginal private cost (MPC) and marginal external cost (MEC) of production?

Question 2

Structured A2 10 marks

Rockford Cement Works produces bags of cement for the construction industry. Its production process releases dust into the air, which increases respiratory illness among people living in the nearby town of Millbrook. This health cost is not paid by Rockford Cement Works and is not reflected in the market price of the cement it sells. It is a negative externality of production.

The table below shows, at different weekly output levels, the market price (which equals both marginal private benefit, MPB, and marginal social benefit, MSB, since there is no externality in the consumption of cement), the marginal private cost (MPC) to Rockford Cement Works, the constant marginal external cost (MEC) imposed on Millbrook residents, and the resulting marginal social cost (MSC).

Output (thousand bags per week) Price = MPB = MSB ($ per bag) MPC ($ per bag) MEC ($ per bag) MSC = MPC + MEC ($ per bag)
0 100 20 20 40
1 90 30 20 50
2 80 40 20 60
3 70 50 20 70
4 60 60 20 80
5 50 70 20 90
6 40 80 20 100

(a) Explain, using the concepts of marginal private cost and marginal social cost, why the dust from Rockford Cement Works' production is described as a negative externality of production. [2]

(b) Using the table, state (i) the free-market equilibrium output, where MPB = MPC, and (ii) the socially optimum output, where MSB = MSC. [2]

(c) Calculate the marginal external cost per bag at the free-market output, and use it, together with your answers to part (b), to calculate the deadweight welfare loss that results from Rockford Cement Works producing at the free-market output rather than the socially optimum output. Show your working. [4]

(d) Suggest the size of a specific tax per bag that the government could impose on Rockford Cement Works to correct this externality, and briefly explain how such a tax would lead the firm to produce at the socially optimum output. [2]

Question 3

Structured A2 9 marks

Bellview Health Clinic offers seasonal flu vaccinations to the public. Because a vaccinated person is less likely to catch and spread flu to others, each vaccination also protects people who are not vaccinated themselves. A benefit that vaccinated individuals do not personally receive and that is not reflected in the price they pay for the vaccination. There is no externality on the cost side, so marginal private cost equals marginal social cost throughout.

The table below shows, at different monthly output levels, the marginal private benefit (MPB) to the person being vaccinated, the constant marginal external benefit (MEB) to the rest of the population, the resulting marginal social benefit (MSB), and the marginal private cost (MPC), which equals marginal social cost (MSC).

Output (thousand vaccinations per month) MPB ($ per dose) MEB ($ per dose) MSB = MPB + MEB ($ per dose) MPC = MSC ($ per dose)
0 70 20 90 10
1 60 20 80 20
2 50 20 70 30
3 40 20 60 40
4 30 20 50 50
5 20 20 40 60
6 10 20 30 70

(a) Explain, using the concepts of marginal private benefit and marginal social benefit, why flu vaccinations generate a positive externality of consumption. [2]

(b) Using the table, identify the free-market output, where MPB = MPC, and the socially optimal output, where MSB = MSC, and state whether the free market under-provides or over-provides vaccinations relative to the socially optimal level. [3]

(c) Calculate the marginal external benefit per dose at the free-market output, and use it, together with your answers to part (b), to calculate the deadweight welfare loss that results from the clinic providing the free-market quantity of vaccinations rather than the socially optimal quantity. [4]

Question 4

Structured A2 8 marks

SafeDrive Insurance sells comprehensive car insurance policies. Once a driver has bought a policy, SafeDrive cannot observe every decision the driver makes. For example, how carefully they drive, or whether they always park in a secure, well-lit area overnight.

(a) Define asymmetric information, and explain why it is regarded as a source of market failure. [3]

(b) Using the SafeDrive example, explain what is meant by moral hazard, and explain why moral hazard arises specifically because of the asymmetric information between SafeDrive and its policyholders. [3]

(c) Explain one way SafeDrive could redesign its insurance contracts to reduce the moral hazard problem. [2]

Question 5

Structured A2 12 marks

Burning coal to generate electricity releases carbon dioxide, which contributes to global climate change. The resulting costs (such as more frequent extreme weather, rising sea levels and damage to agriculture) fall on people around the world, often far from the power station and long after the electricity was generated.

(a) Using this example, explain why a negative externality such as carbon dioxide emissions can prevent a free market from achieving allocative efficiency. [4]

(b) Discuss the extent to which the carbon dioxide emitted by coal-fired power stations causes a significant misallocation of resources in the market for electricity. [8]

Question 6

Multiple choice A2 1 mark

Economists judge how well a market is performing partly by whether it achieves productive efficiency and partly by whether it achieves allocative efficiency. These are two distinct conditions.

Which of the following best describes productive efficiency, as distinct from allocative efficiency?

Question 7

Structured A2 9 marks

Port Elwyn is a small fishing village on an exposed coastline. Local business owners are discussing whether to fund a new sea wall that would protect the village's harbour and homes from storm-surge flooding. No private firm has come forward to build the sea wall and sell protection to individual residents.

(a) Explain, using this example, what is meant by non-excludability and non-rivalry in consumption, the two characteristics that define a public good. [3]

(b) Explain why these two characteristics are likely to create a free-rider problem if Port Elwyn's sea wall were left to be funded voluntarily by local residents and business owners. [3]

(c) Explain why this free-rider problem means the free market is likely to fail to provide the sea wall at all, even though local residents value the flood protection it would offer. [3]

Question 8

Structured A2 11 marks

Goldenhill Apiary keeps bees to produce and sell jars of honey. While foraging for nectar, the bees also pollinate the apple trees at the neighbouring Orchard Vale farm, increasing Orchard Vale's fruit yields. This pollination benefit is not paid for by Orchard Vale and is not reflected in the market price of Goldenhill Apiary's honey. It is a positive externality of production. There is no externality on the benefit side, so marginal private benefit equals marginal social benefit throughout.

The table below shows, at different monthly output levels, the market price (which equals both marginal private benefit, MPB, and marginal social benefit, MSB, since there is no externality in the consumption of honey), the marginal private cost (MPC) of keeping the bees and producing the honey, the constant marginal external benefit (MEB) to Orchard Vale from pollination, and the resulting marginal social cost (MSC).

Output (thousand jars of honey per month) Price = MPB = MSB ($ per jar) MPC ($ per jar) MEB ($ per jar) MSC = MPC − MEB ($ per jar)
0 61 25 24 1
1 55 31 24 7
2 49 37 24 13
3 43 43 24 19
4 37 49 24 25
5 31 55 24 31
6 25 61 24 37

(a) Explain, using the concepts of marginal private cost and marginal social cost, why the pollination service provided by Goldenhill Apiary's bees to Orchard Vale is a positive externality of production. [2]

(b) Using the table, state (i) the free-market output, where MPB = MPC, and (ii) the socially optimal output, where MSB = MSC, and state whether the free market under-provides or over-provides honey (and the pollination that comes with it) relative to the socially optimal level. [3]

(c) Calculate the marginal external benefit per jar at the free-market output, and use it, together with your answers to part (b), to calculate the deadweight welfare loss that results from Goldenhill Apiary producing at the free-market output rather than the socially optimal output. Show your working. [4]

(d) Suggest the size of a specific subsidy per jar that the government could pay to Goldenhill Apiary to correct this externality, and briefly explain how such a subsidy would lead the firm to produce at the socially optimal output. [2]

Question 9

Structured A2 9 marks

The Anchorage is a bar with an outdoor terrace that hosts amplified live music several nights a week. Customers who visit the terrace enjoy the music, but the noise also carries into nearby apartment blocks, disturbing the sleep and reducing the wellbeing of residents who are not customers of the bar. There is no externality on the cost side, so marginal private cost equals marginal social cost throughout.

The table below shows, at different monthly output levels, the marginal private benefit (MPB) to customers who visit the terrace, the constant marginal external cost (MEC) to nearby residents, the resulting marginal social benefit (MSB), and the marginal private cost (MPC), which equals marginal social cost (MSC).

Output (thousand customer-visits to the terrace per month) MPB ($ per visit) MEC ($ per visit) MSB = MPB − MEC ($ per visit) MPC = MSC ($ per visit)
0 74 16 58 10
1 66 16 50 18
2 58 16 42 26
3 50 16 34 34
4 42 16 26 42
5 34 16 18 50
6 26 16 10 58

(a) Explain, using the concepts of marginal private benefit and marginal social benefit, why the noise from customers on The Anchorage's terrace is a negative externality of consumption. [2]

(b) Using the table, identify the free-market output, where MPB = MPC, and the socially optimal output, where MSB = MSC, and state whether the free market over-consumes or under-consumes terrace visits relative to the socially optimal level. [3]

(c) Calculate the marginal external cost per visit at the free-market output, and use it, together with your answers to part (b), to calculate the deadweight welfare loss that results from customers consuming the free-market quantity of terrace visits rather than the socially optimal quantity. [4]

Question 10

Structured A2 12 marks

BrightPath Logistics runs a regional warehouse and needs skilled staff to operate forklifts and manage its inventory systems. It gives new employees several weeks of specialist training that leaves them highly skilled. Some trained staff later leave BrightPath for better-paid jobs at rival logistics firms nearby, which gain an already-trained worker without having paid anything towards that worker's training.

(a) Explain why the risk that trained staff are hired away by rival firms is likely to cause BrightPath Logistics to provide less staff training than is socially optimal. [4]

(b) Discuss the extent to which a government subsidy paid to firms such as BrightPath Logistics for staff training is the best way to correct this market failure. [8]