Macroeconomic Policy Conflicts and the Phillips Curve: Economics 9708 (Cambridge International AS & A Level)
Syllabus 10.1, 10.2, 10.3 · Strand 5 Government Macroeconomic Intervention
- Questions
- 10
- Total marks
- 75
- Tier mix
- 10 Core
0 of 10 questions completed
Syllabus coverage
- 10.1 5 questions completed
- 10.2 7 questions completed
- 10.3 5 questions completed
Macroeconomic objectives rarely move independently of one another. Rapid growth can pull in imports and strain the balance of payments; a weak external value of the currency can raise import prices and feed inflation; and reducing unemployment by stimulating demand can push the price level up. Recognising these interrelationships is central to evaluating any single policy in isolation.
The clearest example is the Phillips curve, which plots a historical inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment: in the short run, policy that lowers unemployment appears to raise inflation, and vice versa. The expectations-augmented Phillips curve modifies this by showing that once workers and firms adjust their expectations of inflation, the short-run trade-off disappears and the economy returns to its natural rate of unemployment at a higher expected inflation rate, implying no long-run trade-off. Given these conflicts, evaluating fiscal, monetary, supply-side and exchange rate policy means weighing which objectives each policy helps, which it may worsen, and the risk of government failure in macroeconomic management.
The worked examples below are original and fully explained.
Question 1
The economy of Cedar Falls currently has an unemployment rate of 6% and an inflation rate of 3%. The central bank sharply cuts interest rates to stimulate aggregate demand and reduce unemployment. According to the traditional (short-run) Phillips curve, which combination of changes in the unemployment rate and the inflation rate would this policy most likely produce, as the economy moves along the existing curve?
Question 2
The government of Solantis pursues an expansionary demand-side policy over three years, aiming to keep cutting the unemployment rate. The table shows Solantis's unemployment rate and inflation rate at the end of each year.
| Year | Unemployment rate (%) | Inflation rate (% per annum) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.5 | 2.5 |
| 2 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| 3 | 5.2 | 10.0 |
(a) Using the data, calculate the change, in percentage points, in the unemployment rate and in the inflation rate (i) between Year 1 and Year 2, and (ii) between Year 2 and Year 3. [4]
(b) Explain why the changes between Year 1 and Year 2 are consistent with the traditional (short-run) Phillips curve trade-off between unemployment and inflation. [3]
(c) Using the expectations-augmented Phillips curve, explain why the changes between Year 2 and Year 3 suggest that Solantis's government could not permanently hold unemployment at 5.0% without accelerating inflation, and that around 5% may be close to Solantis's natural rate of unemployment. [5]
Question 3
Meridia's unemployment rate has been persistently above its historical average. To reduce unemployment, Meridia's government cuts income tax rates and increases spending on public infrastructure, an expansionary fiscal policy.
(a) Explain how this expansionary fiscal policy is intended to reduce unemployment in Meridia. [3]
(b) Explain two macroeconomic policy conflicts that this expansionary fiscal policy could create for Meridia's government: one involving the objective of low inflation, and one involving the objective of a sustainable current account of the balance of payments. [4]
(c) Explain how a supply-side policy could help Meridia reduce the conflict between low unemployment and low inflation identified in part (b). [3]
Question 4
A government wants to reduce its unemployment rate without causing an unacceptable rise in its rate of inflation.
(a) Explain, using the concept of the short-run Phillips curve, why using demand-side policy alone to reduce unemployment risks a conflict with the objective of low inflation. [4]
(b) Discuss the extent to which supply-side policies can allow a government to reduce unemployment without this conflict with the objective of low inflation. [8]
Question 5
Astara's government has introduced a series of policies, large increases in infrastructure spending and tax incentives for business investment, explicitly aimed at raising Astara's rate of economic growth.
(a) Explain how a faster rate of economic growth in Astara could worsen its current account of the balance of payments. [3]
(b) Explain how a faster rate of economic growth in Astara could conflict with the objective of environmental sustainability. [3]
(c) Explain how a faster rate of economic growth in Astara could conflict with the objective of a more equal distribution of income and wealth. [3]
Question 6
Kestrelle's currency depreciates sharply on the foreign exchange market, significantly raising the domestic price of imported raw materials and imported consumer goods. Assuming there is no change in aggregate demand, what is the most likely effect of this depreciation on the short-run Phillips curve and the inflation-unemployment trade-off it represents?
Question 7
Palmira's currency, the corona, is currently valued at 1 corona = $0.50 on the foreign exchange market. Palmira's central bank pursues a policy of managed depreciation, allowing market forces to push the exchange rate down to 1 corona = $0.40, in order to make Palmira's exports more price-competitive abroad.
(a) Calculate the percentage change in the dollar value of the corona. [2]
(b) Explain how this depreciation could help Palmira achieve a faster rate of economic growth and improve its current account of the balance of payments. [3]
(c) Explain how this same depreciation could conflict with Palmira's objective of low and stable inflation. [3]
Question 8
Nordavia is a small economy whose main export is copper. Global copper prices rise sharply on world commodity markets, significantly increasing the revenue earned by Nordavia's copper exporters, with no change in government policy.
(a) Explain how this rise in copper export revenue is likely to affect Nordavia's rate of unemployment. [3]
(b) Explain how this rise in copper export revenue is likely to affect Nordavia's rate of inflation. [3]
(c) Explain how this rise in copper export revenue is likely to affect Nordavia's current account of the balance of payments. [3]
Question 9
Doverath's rate of inflation has risen well above the government's target range. To bring inflation back down, the central bank raises its policy interest rate sharply.
(a) Explain, using the short-run Phillips curve, why raising interest rates to reduce inflation is likely to increase Doverath's rate of unemployment. [4]
(b) The higher interest rate also causes Doverath's exchange rate to appreciate. Discuss the extent to which this appreciation creates additional conflicts with the macroeconomic objectives of economic growth and a sustainable current account of the balance of payments, on top of the rise in unemployment identified in part (a). [8]
Question 10
A government wants to raise its rate of economic growth, reduce unemployment, keep inflation low, and improve its current account of the balance of payments, all at the same time. Which of the following policies is most likely to make progress towards all four objectives together, rather than requiring a trade-off between them?